Many times in literature there are the hero and the good guy
figures. But in some novels, the good guy or hero may not be as great as they
may seem. Sometimes they are the villain but you wouldn’t know that from their
point of view. They believe that they are doing the right things, but from
another’s they are criminals. I know of two examples of this scenario, the
first is Fahrenheit 451. In it firemen are portrayed as the good guys by
ridding society of books which are known as primitive pieces of information.
The other example is John Hammond from Jurassic Park. For most of the
book you see him as a good guy but later when things start going bad you really
get to know him.
At the beginning of Fahrenheit 451 you know Guy as a
firefighter doing the service of ridding society of books that are known as
obsolete. You think he is doing the right thing until he starts thinking about
what he’s doing. That is the point when you realize that he isn’t doing anyone
a favor but being a plain out murderer. He finally realizes that when a woman
refuses to leave her forsaken house and is soon engulfed in fiery oblivion. After
this event he decides that he wants to go against what he did and bring books
back.
In Jurassic Park you are
introduced to John Hammond, an eccentric entrepreneur. He is shown as a man who
loves everybody and wouldn’t want anything to happen to anybody. He is just a
man with a mission to open an amusement park featuring living dinosaurs. But
when things go wrong, dinosaurs escape, and people die he turns to a nasty,
greedy, self-consumed jerk who cares about nothing but money and his own
well-being. We see an example of this when he thinks about opening a new park but with less chance of
failure -- because he doesn’t care about any fatalities from the current park.
There is a big connection between
both stories,;they both portrayed the characters as good guys in the beginning
but as you get to know more and more you realize that they are actually
evil-doers. However, there is also a big difference between the two and that is
the fact that Guy attempts to undo what he has done while Hammond stays the
same old stingy guy that he has always been deep down.
Things have a way of connecting
though not intentionally, especially in literature. These are pretty similar in the way they
introduce the characters but as the books progress they become different in the way the
characters experiences the events. Despite these similarities and differences
no matter what, they are both great novels.